Subject	With the .64 A/R and Mike Smith manifolds you would be fine. (n/m)
Posted by	phillyz on September 06, 2007 at 9:05 AM
	This message has been viewed 174 times.
In Reply To	Don't want too much lag, heard those have more lag if posted by Quick_Z on September 06, 2007 at 09:04 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Sport 530s vs. GT600R Turbos - Quick_Z 08:51:47 09/06/07 Get sport 700bb's with .64 A/R - ;-) (n/m) - phillyz 08:57:09 09/06/07 Don't want too much lag, heard those have more lag if - Quick_Z 09:04:13 09/06/07 With the .64 A/R and Mike Smith manifolds you would be fine. (n/m) - phillyz 09:05:49 09/06/07 Do the Mike Smith manifolds have heat shields, or accept - Quick_Z 09:13:12 09/06/07 yes (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 09:32:28 09/06/07 They use the stock heat shields. I believe we did some - Scotts94z32 10:07:40 09/06/07 Define "fine". (I don't see disco potatoes in your profile) (n/m) - Inzane 09:47:12 09/06/07 second - Alan(NJ) 09:49:36 09/06/07 Funny, i have a package for that, and then some >> - Coz@CZP 01:16:21 09/07/07 Check out the following links. - MannyB 09:42:34 09/06/07 Sport 530BB = GT2554R, GT600R = GT2560R. The latter will - Inzane 09:51:11 09/06/07 Re: Sport 530s vs. GT600R Turbos - sparkie 09:51:27 09/06/07 second - Alan(NJ) 10:00:06 09/06/07 "you get what you pay for" : $2800+ worth?? - Inzane 10:09:02 09/06/07 call some forum sponsors and ask them about it (n/m) - Alan(NJ) 10:31:06 09/06/07 Are you implying some are pricing it < $2800 now? - Inzane 10:43:03 09/06/07 no im talking about quality of Z1 and JWT (n/m) - Alan(NJ) 11:11:00 09/06/07 I'm not talking about quality, I'm talking about price. - Inzane 11:26:42 09/06/07 ur right - Alan(NJ) 11:30:53 09/06/07 they are both brand new turbos from the same place. (n/m) - AntiHero 10:13:34 09/06/07 Re: Sport 530s vs. GT600R Turbos - sparkie 09:54:38 09/06/07 both are quality products - AntiHero 10:12:02 09/06/07 JWT, That is all i got to say. Do some search an youll know - Eishozzzz 11:40:53 09/06/07 Re: Sport 530s vs. GT600R Turbos - Vuk@Absolute Motorsports Inc. 15:47:39 09/06/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.